Message360399
| Author |
nanjekyejoannah |
| Recipients |
Valentyn Tymofieiev, brett.cannon, eric.snow, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, p-ganssle, pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年01月21日.14:14:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1579616067.52.0.12529655542.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change to *stable* branches.
My worry are the many changes that are required to ceval to make this back port work. Not that I think we can not successfully backport things. we can. |
|