Message358128
| Author |
BTaskaya |
| Recipients |
BTaskaya, Michel Desmoulin, ammar2, gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, vstinner, xtreak |
| Date |
2019年12月09日.18:57:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1575917858.07.0.227695677048.issue20443@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I am not sure that if co_filename can break backwards compability or not (because until CodeType.replace; it was usual to break code object construction, people who are using code objects may take this too) but yes PR 17534 was necessary.
My initial patch (PR 13527) proposed a future directive to do this (and poorly implemented the concept) which can be helpful (yet it needs a PEP). |
|