Message356870
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
vstinner |
| Date |
2019年11月18日.14:35:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1574087751.21.0.402733884196.issue38835@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The bpo-29137 removed the fpectl module. But two macros were kept in pyfpe.h:
/* These macros used to do something when Python was built with --with-fpectl,
* but support for that was dropped in 3.7. We continue to define them though,
* to avoid breaking API users.
*/
#define PyFPE_START_PROTECT(err_string, leave_stmt)
#define PyFPE_END_PROTECT(v)
I propose to exclude them from the stable API. Maybe at least exclude them from the stable API >= 3.9?
commit 735ae8d139a673b30b321dc10acfd3d14f0d633b
Author: Nathaniel J. Smith <njs@pobox.com>
Date: Fri Jan 5 23:15:34 2018 -0800
bpo-29137: Remove fpectl module (#4789)
This module has never been enabled by default, never worked correctly
on x86-64, and caused ABI problems that caused C extension
compatibility. See bpo-29137 for details/discussion. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2019年11月18日 14:35:51 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner |
| 2019年11月18日 14:35:51 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1574087751.21.0.402733884196.issue38835@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019年11月18日 14:35:51 | vstinner | link | issue38835 messages |
| 2019年11月18日 14:35:50 | vstinner | create |
|