Message356483
| Author |
brett.cannon |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, fabioz, vstinner |
| Date |
2019年11月12日.19:38:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1573587527.5.0.712528005259.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I would like to bring this issue back on topic as this about how to expose PEP 523 support in Python 3.8, not whether Fabio should be using a different approach when he has been something sanctioned in an accepted PEP and was previously doable that was (accidentally) taken away from him.
If people want to do a separate PEP to roll back PEP 523 that's fine, but until that occurs I think we should move forward with the fact that PEP 523 is active. |
|