Message353344
| Author |
gregory.p.smith |
| Recipients |
ammar2, benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, lukasz.langa, mcepl, ned.deily, tburke, webknjaz, xtreak |
| Date |
2019年09月27日.05:32:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1569562346.06.0.613529633222.issue38216@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Regardless, since things have already shipped in stable releases, there is a release that code _will_ encounter somewhere that does validate data but does not support overruling that behavior. so i'm not sure if it actually matters to have this in 3.7 or 3.6 as anyone who wants to avoid complaints from users who happen to be on those python patch levels will need to include a workaround in their code or explicitly avoid those versions.
That said, PR 16321 looks overall like a good idea, I have no problem with it being backported to 3.7 and 3.6. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2019年09月27日 05:32:26 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients:
+ gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, mcepl, lukasz.langa, webknjaz, ammar2, tburke, xtreak |
| 2019年09月27日 05:32:26 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1569562346.06.0.613529633222.issue38216@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019年09月27日 05:32:26 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue38216 messages |
| 2019年09月27日 05:32:25 | gregory.p.smith | create |
|