Message 349785 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	benjamin.peterson
Recipients	Greg Price, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, lemburg, miss-islington, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2019年08月15日.01:24:13
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<83df210e-df05-4894-b3c4-c53d67bb6639@www.fastmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1565778336.83.0.280142443658.issue37760@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 03:25, STINNER Victor wrote: > > STINNER Victor <vstinner@redhat.com> added the comment: > > > From my perspective, the main problem with using type annotations is that there's nothing checking them in CI. > > Even if unchecked, type annotations can serve as builtin documentation, > as docstrings (even when docstrings are not checked ;-)). Yes, but no one has the expectation that docstrings are automatically verified in any way. :)

Content

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 03:25, STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <vstinner@redhat.com> added the comment:
> 
> > From my perspective, the main problem with using type annotations is that there's nothing checking them in CI.
> 
> Even if unchecked, type annotations can serve as builtin documentation, 
> as docstrings (even when docstrings are not checked ;-)).
Yes, but no one has the expectation that docstrings are automatically verified in any way. :)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019年08月15日 01:24:14	benjamin.peterson	set	recipients: + benjamin.peterson, lemburg, vstinner, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka, Greg Price, miss-islington
2019年08月15日 01:24:14	benjamin.peterson	link	issue37760 messages
2019年08月15日 01:24:13	benjamin.peterson	create

homepage