Message346100
| Author |
jdemeyer |
| Recipients |
jdemeyer, ncoghlan, petr.viktorin, scoder, steve.dower, vstinner |
| Date |
2019年06月20日.05:34:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1561008873.14.0.0618504065373.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The fact that tp_vectorcall_offset replaces tp_print was a very conscious decision that we made already when designing the PEPs (both PEP 580 and PEP 590). We shouldn't just throw that away without a good reason.
So far I haven't seen any good reason, only an unsubstantiated claim that it is supposedly more backwards compatible to put tp_vectorcall_offset at the end. |
|