Message 345356 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	vstinner
Recipients	jdemeyer, petr.viktorin, scoder, vstinner
Date	2019年06月12日.13:47:34
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1560347255.02.0.420166742386.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
> Or maybe you're confusing tp_vectorcall_offset and tp_vectorcall again? The two are related, no? Honestly, reintroducing tp_print looks simple and safe enough. I'm in favor of doing that. Is there any drawback? (as I wrote, I don't think that the size of PyTypeObject really matters in practice)

Content

> Or maybe you're confusing tp_vectorcall_offset and tp_vectorcall again?
The two are related, no?
Honestly, reintroducing tp_print looks simple and safe enough. I'm in favor of doing that. Is there any drawback? (as I wrote, I don't think that the size of PyTypeObject really matters in practice)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019年06月12日 13:47:35	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, scoder, petr.viktorin, jdemeyer
2019年06月12日 13:47:35	vstinner	set	messageid: <1560347255.02.0.420166742386.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019年06月12日 13:47:35	vstinner	link	issue37250 messages
2019年06月12日 13:47:34	vstinner	create

homepage