Message344602
| Author |
giampaolo.rodola |
| Recipients |
StyXman, desbma, facundobatista, giampaolo.rodola, martin.panter, ncoghlan, neologix, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, vstinner |
| Date |
2019年06月04日.16:49:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1559666976.15.0.146258116518.issue26826@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Actually "man copy_file_range" claims it can do server-side copy, meaning no network traffic between client and server if *src* and *dst* live on the same network fs. So I agree copy_file_range() should be preferred over sendfile() after all. =)
I have a wrapper for copy_file_range() similar to what I did in shutil in issue33671 which I can easily integrate, but I wanted to land this one first:
https://bugs.python.org/issue37096
Also, I suppose we cannot land this in time for 3.8? |
|