Message333487
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
larry, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xtreak |
| Date |
2019年01月11日.17:09:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1547226579.06.0.836314325498.issue35582@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
PR 11524 performs the same kind of changes as PR 11520, but for handwritten code (only if this causes noticeable speed up). Also iter() is now use the fast call convention.
$ ./python -m timeit "iter(())"
Unpatched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 82.8 nsec per loop
Patched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 56.3 nsec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s "it = iter([])" "next(it, None)"
Unpatched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 54.1 nsec per loop
Patched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 44.9 nsec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "getattr(1, 'numerator')"
Unpatched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 63.6 nsec per loop
Patched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 57.5 nsec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s "from operator import attrgetter; f = attrgetter('numerator')" "f(1)"
Unpatched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 64.1 nsec per loop
Patched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 56.8 nsec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s "from operator import methodcaller; f = methodcaller('conjugate')" "f(1)"
Unpatched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 79.5 nsec per loop
Patched: 5000000 loops, best of 5: 74.1 nsec per loop
It is possible to speed up also many math methods and maybe some contextvar and hamt methods, but this is for other issues. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2019年01月11日 17:09:40 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, scoder, vstinner, larry, xtreak |
| 2019年01月11日 17:09:39 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1547226579.06.0.836314325498.issue35582@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019年01月11日 17:09:39 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue35582 messages |
| 2019年01月11日 17:09:39 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|