homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients gregory.p.smith, izbyshev, nanjekyejoannah, pablogsal, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2018年12月20日.11:34:31
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1545305671.78.0.788709270274.issue35537@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Do you mean running tests twice, one with posix_spawn(), one without?
I mean that after writing tests they can be tested manually by disabling conditions for posix_spawn one by one. I.e. some tests should fail if remove "stdout is None" and some tests should fail if remove "not close_fds", etc.
> Can you please elaborate? posix_spawn() may or may not use fork() internally.
_posixsubprocess.fork_exec() calls PyOS_BeforeFork/PyOS_AfterFork_Child/PyOS_AfterFork_Parent. If use os.posix_spawn(), these calls will be omitted. This is a behavior change. We should either call these functions manually before/after os.posix_spawn() (but I do not know what to do with PyOS_AfterFork_Child), or disable using os.posix_spawn() if non-trivial callbacks were added, or use other methods for calling registered callbacks. But the stdlib already adds callbacks in the threading and random modules.
History
Date User Action Args
2018年12月20日 11:34:31serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, izbyshev, pablogsal, nanjekyejoannah
2018年12月20日 11:34:31serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1545305671.78.0.788709270274.issue35537@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018年12月20日 11:34:31serhiy.storchakalinkissue35537 messages
2018年12月20日 11:34:31serhiy.storchakacreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /