Message326958
| Author |
nedbat |
| Recipients |
ammar2, nedbat, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2018年10月03日.10:08:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1538561301.68.0.545547206417.issue34876@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, I agree that the assignment statement behavior is fine. The stacked decorator behavior is not.
I understand that under the hood the two cases are very similar, but the syntax is different. Jumping back to the first decorator makes it look like the decorators are executed in order and then the first decorator runs again. There is nothing in the syntax that makes revisting the first decorator line reasonable. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年10月03日 10:08:21 | nedbat | set | recipients:
+ nedbat, serhiy.storchaka, ammar2 |
| 2018年10月03日 10:08:21 | nedbat | set | messageid: <1538561301.68.0.545547206417.issue34876@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年10月03日 10:08:21 | nedbat | link | issue34876 messages |
| 2018年10月03日 10:08:21 | nedbat | create |
|