Message324828
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2018年09月08日.10:49:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1536403768.97.0.56676864532.issue34595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think we need to handle only two cases: short and fully qualified names. __qualname__ without __module__ doesn't make sense, and the value of tp_name depends on implementation details (is it Python class or builtin class, heap class or dynamic class?). Maybe use %t and %T?
But we may want to support formatting the name of the type itself and the name of the object's type. This give us 4 variants.
For old string formatting we can introduce new % codes (with possible modifiers). But in modern string formatting "T" can have meaning for some types (e.g. for datetime). We can implement __format__ for the type type itself (though it can cause confusion if cls.__format__() is different from cls.__format__(instance)), but for formatting the name of the object's type (as in your original proposition) we need to add a new conversion flag like "!r". |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年09月08日 10:49:28 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, eric.smith |
| 2018年09月08日 10:49:28 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1536403768.97.0.56676864532.issue34595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年09月08日 10:49:28 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue34595 messages |
| 2018年09月08日 10:49:28 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|