Message321384
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, emilyemorehouse, eric.snow, hroncok, mcepl, ncoghlan, vstinner |
| Date |
2018年07月10日.12:51:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1531227100.55.0.56676864532.issue34008@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thinking about this some more, I'm inclined to go the same way we did with issue 33932: classify it as an outright regression, work out the desired requirements for a missing embedding test case, and then fix the implementation to pass the new test case.
My suggestion for test commands would be:
../Lib/site.py
-m site
-c 'import sys; print(sys.argv)' some test data here
Once those work properly, we'd consider the regression relative to Python 3.6 fixed.
Those could either be 3 different test cases, or else we could run them all within a single test case, with a Py_Initialize() call before each one (since Py_Main() calls Py_Finalize() internally). |
|