Message320754
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Ivan.Pozdeev, barry, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, eric.smith, eric.snow, ethan smith, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, takluyver |
| Date |
2018年06月30日.06:37:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1530340668.37.0.56676864532.issue33944@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think we also need to clearly separate two distinct aspects of .pth files:
1. "import <module>; <arbitrary code execution goes here>" lines <--- Kill it with fire
2. "<add this directory to sys.path>" lines <--- This is fine and good and perfectly sensible
It's point 2 that powers things like "pew add", and I don't see any particularly compelling reason to get rid of it.
The "arbitrary code invocation for every single Python execution using that environment" aspect, on the other hand, is mostly a PITA, and used as a workaround for other features being missing (e.g. the PYTHONRUNFIRST proposal in https://bugs.python.org/issue14803). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年06月30日 06:37:48 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, mhammond, barry, brett.cannon, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, eric.snow, takluyver, Ivan.Pozdeev, ethan smith |
| 2018年06月30日 06:37:48 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1530340668.37.0.56676864532.issue33944@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年06月30日 06:37:48 | ncoghlan | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2018年06月30日 06:37:47 | ncoghlan | create |
|