Message316268
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
John Jones, alex, benjamin.peterson, dhduvall, gennad, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, miss-islington, ned.deily, neologix, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2018年05月07日.12:56:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1525697812.92.0.682650639539.issue20104@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I have doubts about combining setschedpolicy and setschedparam.
On one hand, they are set by independent functions in C and have separate flags. When pass arguments separately we don't need to invent a parameter name: just remove the common "posix_spawnattr_" prefix from corresponding C function names. Passing scheduler=(None, param) looks clumsy. And from implementation side, parsing separate arguments is easier that parsing a single argument as a 2-tuple.
On other hand, these arguments are not completely independent: the setschedparam argument is required if setschedpolicy is specified.
Passing as separate arguments still looks more preferable to me. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年05月07日 12:56:53 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, alex, dhduvall, neologix, gennad, martin.panter, John Jones, pablogsal, miss-islington |
| 2018年05月07日 12:56:52 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1525697812.92.0.682650639539.issue20104@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年05月07日 12:56:52 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue20104 messages |
| 2018年05月07日 12:56:52 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|