Message315009
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
THRlWiTi, louielu, terry.reedy, wohlganger |
| Date |
2018年04月06日.03:41:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1522986061.95.0.682650639539.issue18875@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
My question about the idea is whether beginners would use this, or if it is the sort of 'expert' feature that IDLE should avoid. I may ask on python-list for more opinions.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49677886/python-idle-symbol-completion/49684824#49684824 adds a vote in favor. It also prompted me to review the patch.
Since I said, 4 years ago, that the feature should be an extension, we have converted extensions to features. So the patch needs re-writing, as I outlined.
(Although there is now an extension configuration dialog, it is no longer a dependency of this issue.)
I am not convinced that we need 5 configuration options, especially since I do not understand 2 of them ;-). Do symbol and quote fences need to be separately enabled? Does anyone known what other IDEs do? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年04月06日 03:41:02 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, THRlWiTi, louielu, wohlganger |
| 2018年04月06日 03:41:01 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1522986061.95.0.682650639539.issue18875@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年04月06日 03:41:01 | terry.reedy | link | issue18875 messages |
| 2018年04月06日 03:41:00 | terry.reedy | create |
|