Message312625
| Author |
Mark.Shannon |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, methane, ned.deily, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2018年02月23日.10:16:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1519381015.03.0.467229070634.issue32911@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Serhiy, thanks for reopening this issue.
It seems to be that there are three reasonable choices:
1. Revert to 3.6 behaviour, with the addition of `docstring` attribute.
2. Change the docstring attribute to an AST node, possibly by modifying the grammar.
3. Do nothing.
I would prefer 1, as it requires no changes to 3rd party code and doesn't present an additional obstacle when porting from Python 2.
2 would be acceptable, as it allows tools to easily convert the body back to its 3.6 form (or vice-versa)
3 is a pain as it involves re-tokenizing the file to get the location of the doc-string. |
|