Message 309048 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	cheryl.sabella
Recipients	cheryl.sabella, terry.reedy
Date	2017年12月26日.00:02:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1514246535.99.0.213398074469.issue32411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Terry, I'm not sure if I phrased my initial question correctly. I've made a pull request to show you what I was thinking. What I had tried to show with the test case change is that, prior to the guarantee of insertion order on the dictionary, the check `eq(tcl, [C0, f0])` would have failed without the sort because `transform_children` would have returned `[f0, C0]`. With the sort in place or with the guarantee insertion order, this test doesn't fail. Thanks!

Content

Terry,
I'm not sure if I phrased my initial question correctly. I've made a pull request to show you what I was thinking.
What I had tried to show with the test case change is that, prior to the guarantee of insertion order on the dictionary, the check `eq(tcl, [C0, f0])` would have failed without the sort because `transform_children` would have returned `[f0, C0]`. With the sort in place or with the guarantee insertion order, this test doesn't fail.
Thanks!

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017年12月26日 00:02:16	cheryl.sabella	set	recipients: + cheryl.sabella, terry.reedy
2017年12月26日 00:02:15	cheryl.sabella	set	messageid: <1514246535.99.0.213398074469.issue32411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017年12月26日 00:02:15	cheryl.sabella	link	issue32411 messages
2017年12月26日 00:02:15	cheryl.sabella	create

homepage