Message308197
| Author |
steven.daprano |
| Recipients |
Maik Ro, docs@python, steven.daprano |
| Date |
2017年12月13日.11:06:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1513163210.2.0.213398074469.issue32301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The given version is correct: the comma is only required if the initializer is given. Your suggested version
typecode, [initializer]
implies that the comma is always required whether the initializer is given or not.
If we want to be absolutely pedantic, we could write:
.. class:: array(typecode[, [initializer]])
as trailing commas are legal in function calls. But I don't think that makes for good documentation. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年12月13日 11:06:50 | steven.daprano | set | recipients:
+ steven.daprano, docs@python, Maik Ro |
| 2017年12月13日 11:06:50 | steven.daprano | set | messageid: <1513163210.2.0.213398074469.issue32301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年12月13日 11:06:50 | steven.daprano | link | issue32301 messages |
| 2017年12月13日 11:06:50 | steven.daprano | create |
|