Message307441
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Alcolo Alcolo, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, mrabarnett, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2017年12月02日.17:37:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1512236244.88.0.213398074469.issue25054@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Good point. Neither old nor new (which matches regex) behaviors conform the documentation: "Empty matches are included in the result unless they touch the beginning of another match." It is easy to exclude empty matches that touch the *ending* of another match. This would be consistent with the new behavior of split() and sub().
But this would break a one existing test for issue817234. Though that issue shouldn't rely on this detail. The test should just test that iterating doesn't hang.
And this would break a regular expression in pprint.
PR 4678 implements this version. I don't know what version is better.
>>> list(re.finditer(r"\b|:+", "a::bc"))
[<re.Match object; span=(0, 0), match=''>, <re.Match object; span=(1, 1), match=''>, <re.Match object; span=(1, 3), match='::'>, <re.Match object; span=(5, 5), match=''>]
>>> re.sub(r"(\b|:+)", r"[1円]", "a::bc")
'[]a[][::]bc[]'
With PR 4471 the result of re.sub() is the same, but the result of re.finditer() is as in msg307424. |
|