Message 307165 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	vstinner
Recipients	Decorater, jbfzs, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, Александр Карпинский
Date	2017年11月28日.20:48:10
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1511902090.67.0.213398074469.issue27535@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I ran a quick benchmark on Python 3.6: current code (3.6 branch, ref) => PR 4587 (patch): vstinner@apu$ python3 -m perf compare_to ref.json patch.json Mean +- std dev: [ref] 597 ns +- 10 ns -> [patch] 830 ns +- 15 ns: 1.39x slower (+39%) I don't want to backport an optimization to a stable branch, so I prefer to not backport the warnings change on the ignore action to Python 3.6. I rejected my PR 4587. The bug was fixed in master. I don't want to backport the change to 2.7 nor 3.6, so I close the issue.

Content

I ran a quick benchmark on Python 3.6: current code (3.6 branch, ref) => PR 4587 (patch):
vstinner@apu$ python3 -m perf compare_to ref.json patch.json 
Mean +- std dev: [ref] 597 ns +- 10 ns -> [patch] 830 ns +- 15 ns: 1.39x slower (+39%)
I don't want to backport an optimization to a stable branch, so I prefer to not backport the warnings change on the ignore action to Python 3.6. I rejected my PR 4587.
The bug was fixed in master. I don't want to backport the change to 2.7 nor 3.6, so I close the issue.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017年11月28日 20:48:10	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, Decorater, Александр Карпинский, jbfzs
2017年11月28日 20:48:10	vstinner	set	messageid: <1511902090.67.0.213398074469.issue27535@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017年11月28日 20:48:10	vstinner	link	issue27535 messages
2017年11月28日 20:48:10	vstinner	create

homepage