Message305939
| Author |
benjamin.peterson |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, pitrou, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年11月09日.06:25:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1510208731.1358535.1166622400.70650663@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1510150466.07.0.213398074469.issue27987@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 06:14, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> alignment.patch: + long double dummy; /* force worst-case alignment
> */
>
> Would it be possible to use max_align_t mentioned by Stefan, at least
> when this type is available?
Yes, that would be the correct thing to do. I was looking for the quick
hack.
>
> What is the impact of the patch on objects size?
On 64-bit platforms, I believe it wastes a word for GC objects. |
|