Message305436
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
davin, jeff.allen, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, tim.peters |
| Date |
2017年11月02日.16:04:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1509638664.85.0.213398074469.issue31630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I'd be surprised if sin(x)/cos(x) were materially better.
Yep. I made the same assumption as you, but then "realised" that to get to the tan tests, we must already have passed all the cos tests, so cos must be okay.
I thought I'd written cos tests near pi/2 as well as tan ones, but unfortunately it turns out that's not true. My bad. Those tests should probably be added to cmath_testcases.txt. |
|