Message304878
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, neologix, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, tim.peters, trent, vstinner, wscullin |
| Date |
2017年10月24日.09:08:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1508836114.15.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
[me]
> This weakens my use case somewhat [...]
I looked at Victor's patch, and thanks to the alignment <= ALIGNMENT
optimization it seems that always using the aligned_alloc() and
aligned_free() versions for a specific pointer is fast. Nice!
So I retract the weakening of my use case (still shame on Microsoft
for not implementing C11). :) |
|