Message304325
| Author |
arigo |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, arigo, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, njs, vstinner, xdegaye, xgdomingo, yselivanov |
| Date |
2017年10月13日.08:16:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1507882610.01.0.213398074469.issue30744@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks Nick for the clarification. Yes, that's what I meant: supporting such code in simple JITs is a nightmare. Perhaps more importantly, I am sure that if Python starts supporting random mutation of locals outside tracing hooks, then it would open the door to various hacks that are best not done at all, from a code quality point of view. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年10月13日 08:16:50 | arigo | set | recipients:
+ arigo, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, belopolsky, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, xdegaye, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, xgdomingo |
| 2017年10月13日 08:16:50 | arigo | set | messageid: <1507882610.01.0.213398074469.issue30744@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年10月13日 08:16:50 | arigo | link | issue30744 messages |
| 2017年10月13日 08:16:49 | arigo | create |
|