Message302892
| Author |
vaultah |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins, vaultah |
| Date |
2017年09月24日.22:51:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1506293495.59.0.133053670121.issue31299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, a public built-in facility to modify a traceback would certainly be useful, although there should be a standard way to "hide" unwanted frames without mutating the traceback, too, and the traceback module seems a perfect place to add it.
I have no objections to the `filter` argument, though filtering out frames based on modules to me feels by far more common a task than anything else `filter` would be capable of.
I can update the PR if there's a consensus that `filter` is favored over `ignore_modules`. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年09月24日 22:51:35 | vaultah | set | recipients:
+ vaultah, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins |
| 2017年09月24日 22:51:35 | vaultah | set | messageid: <1506293495.59.0.133053670121.issue31299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年09月24日 22:51:35 | vaultah | link | issue31299 messages |
| 2017年09月24日 22:51:35 | vaultah | create |
|