Message302502
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, martin.panter, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka, veky, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年09月19日.05:46:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1505800018.33.0.643566907755.issue13224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Specifically this message, where the unwritten rationale is to offer behavioural consistency across the builtin types that know their own name and include it in their current repr() output: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2011-October/012464.html
As per Guido's comment and the discussion of PEP 3155 above, the idea now is that for classes/functions/methods, we make it so that:
repr(x) -> gives both the type and the qualified name (as now)
str(x) -> gives just the qualified name
Importantly, this *won't* change the result of printing full namespaces, since the dict repr calls repr() on values, not str(). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年09月19日 05:46:58 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, eric.snow, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, veky |
| 2017年09月19日 05:46:58 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1505800018.33.0.643566907755.issue13224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年09月19日 05:46:58 | ncoghlan | link | issue13224 messages |
| 2017年09月19日 05:46:57 | ncoghlan | create |
|