Message301349
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
barry, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年09月05日.18:17:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20170905181729.GA3105@bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1504631424.49.0.661108674272.issue31338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 05:10:24PM +0000, STINNER Victor wrote:
> That's a good example of better implementation for Py_UNREACHABLE().
>
> The tricky part is to make compiler warnings quiet. For example, you cannot replace "abort(); return NULL;" with "abort()", because a function without return would emit a warning.
Which compiler needs more than "abort();" in a default statement? gcc and clang
don't. |
|