Message298960
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Demur Rumed, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, mark.dickinson, nascheme, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, trent |
| Date |
2017年07月24日.11:47:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1500896877.44.0.990651761664.issue17611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I don't like the new END_ITER instruction. This complicates (and slows down) the evaluation loop and the peepholer.
I don't think it slows down anything in the eval loop. I agree it adds a bit of complexity.
> This also adds a limitation on the peepholer (END_ITER can't be optimized out).
It's an unconditional backedge, how could you optimize it? |
|