Message298581
| Author |
lazka |
| Recipients |
JelleZijlstra, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, lazka, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang |
| Date |
2017年07月18日.10:53:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1500375221.13.0.139110490736.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Why not just do the following:
>>> from collections import namedtuple
>>> Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
>>> Point._source
"from collections import namedtuple\nPoint = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])\n"
>>>
The docs make it seems as if the primary use case of the _source attribute is
to serialize the definition. Returning a source which produces a class with
different performance/memory characteristics goes against that. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年07月18日 10:53:41 | lazka | set | recipients:
+ lazka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, methane, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, JelleZijlstra |
| 2017年07月18日 10:53:41 | lazka | set | messageid: <1500375221.13.0.139110490736.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年07月18日 10:53:41 | lazka | link | issue28638 messages |
| 2017年07月18日 10:53:41 | lazka | create |
|