Message298515
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
JelleZijlstra, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang |
| Date |
2017年07月17日.13:33:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwYpKupRNMPb6-rVVnOmu3T7pm_QEtGBcr926+gtViL22Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1500298311.43.0.0733064322262.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> It's possible to expose StructSeq somewhere.
Hum, when I mentioned structseq: my idea was more to reimplement
namedtuple using the existing structseq code, since structseq is well
tested and very fast. |
|