Message298490
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
JelleZijlstra, eric.smith, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang |
| Date |
2017年07月17日.12:28:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1500294521.64.0.764217491824.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Check the issue history - the issue has been rejected by Raymond, and then reopened for further debate by other core developers multiple times.
That's not a reasonable approach to requesting reconsideration of a module/API maintainers design decision.
I acknowledge that those earlier reopenings weren't by you, but the issue should still remain closed until *Raymond* agrees to reconsider it (and given the alternative option of instead making the lower overhead PyStructSequence visible at the Python level, I'd be surprised if he does). |
|