Message297561
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, martin.panter, musically_ut, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年07月03日.11:10:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1499080201.36.0.256637445166.issue30302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Alexander: "Sorry for being late to the discussion, but please allow me to add a -1 vote."
While I agree that seconds=28747 is not perfect, IMHO "datetime.timedelta(seconds=28747)" is an enhancement over "datetime.timedelta(0, 28747)".
Can't we make small enhanements step by step, rather than each time try to redesign datetime? ;-)
(Yeah, datetime is now perfect, but well, it's now widely used and part of the stdlib!) |
|