Message297186
| Author |
jdemeyer |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, deleted0524, erik.bray, jdemeyer, ncoghlan, njs, yselivanov |
| Date |
2017年06月28日.14:22:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1498659727.67.0.230102218328.issue29988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> It seems like that does at least try to guarantee that a signal can't interrupt between:
>
> lock.acquire()
> try:
> ...
Actually, I think it's between the end of the `try` and the beginning of the `finally` (which is precisely the same place that *breaks* for a with statement). |
|