Message296952
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
vstinner |
| Date |
2017年06月26日.21:53:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1498514000.69.0.140602113772.issue30776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I had to write this change to be able to bisect bpo-30775 reference leak. Without this change, my bisection tool picked the wrong tests and failed to find the tests which leaked. For example, it took a subtest of tests which was considered as leaking because the reference differences was [3, 0, 0]. This pattern more looks like a late initialization than a real leak. In the case of the bpo-30775, a leak was closer to [222, 222, 225]: much more references than just 3 :-) Many leaks for all runs :-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年06月26日 21:53:20 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner |
| 2017年06月26日 21:53:20 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1498514000.69.0.140602113772.issue30776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年06月26日 21:53:20 | vstinner | link | issue30776 messages |
| 2017年06月26日 21:53:20 | vstinner | create |
|