Message295470
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
cheryl.sabella, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2017年06月08日.21:45:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1496958338.6.0.848160744664.issue27534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, I do want to continue this. As I explained in msg270522, I shelved (but not abandoned) the autocomplete patch because it caused a test failure I did not (and do not) understand, and because I found another fix for that issue. The reductions I noted above were for the patch I did apply, not this one.
Update: I just created pr_2011 and test_idle passes. I'm puzzled. I don't remember patching autocomplete since last July. Anyway, if the patch works, I can now decide if I really want to go this route. It makes sense to keep related functions together. It also makes sense to keep functions that run in the same process together. I should see if this patch has any noticeable benefit (time and import reduction) and if a similar patch for call tips works and has benefit. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年06月08日 21:45:38 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, cheryl.sabella |
| 2017年06月08日 21:45:38 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1496958338.6.0.848160744664.issue27534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年06月08日 21:45:38 | terry.reedy | link | issue27534 messages |
| 2017年06月08日 21:45:38 | terry.reedy | create |
|