Message295326
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
alex, georg.brandl, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年06月07日.09:56:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1496829393.45.0.889505713229.issue30080@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Ah, I even didn't know that "perf timeit" supports -n since it doesn't report the number of loops. And seems it runs the benchmark much more times, since even with -n1 it is slow. If the number of loops is determined automatically, it would do not matter.
I choose the meaning of --duplicate so that it almost not affect the total time of the benchmarking. Larger value just decreases the overhead of the iteration. |
|