Message294516
| Author |
llllllllll |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, llllllllll |
| Date |
2017年05月25日.22:41:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1495752080.24.0.264186476964.issue30477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The old error of tuple.index(x): x not in tuple seemed very confusing to me. It was also harder to quickly understand what the program was doing wrong. This saves people a second pass through the program under the debugger because they can just see what the invalid value was.
The reason I am explicitly calling repr instead of using %R is that I didn't want to call repr twice if I didn't need to. If people think that is fine the format can just be tuple.index(%R): %R not in tuple instead. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年05月25日 22:41:20 | llllllllll | set | recipients:
+ llllllllll, brett.cannon |
| 2017年05月25日 22:41:20 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1495752080.24.0.264186476964.issue30477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年05月25日 22:41:20 | llllllllll | link | issue30477 messages |
| 2017年05月25日 22:41:20 | llllllllll | create |
|