Message294157
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
alex, benjamin.peterson, dalke, eryksun, holdenweb, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年05月22日.15:28:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1495466909.05.0.13743352756.issue21074@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> (I reopen the issue since it got a long new comment.)
Andrew specifically said, "I don't propose re-opening it".
FWIW, the zen of python also says, "practicality beats purity". For most users, most of the time, the peephole optimizer is a net win and it encourages us to write clearer code like "x & (2 ** 32 - 1)" rather than "x & 4294967295". |
|