Message288805
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
gvanrossum, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年03月02日.15:12:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1488467560.66.0.804171371287.issue29695@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Well, I was feeling the same, but asked just for the case.
Could you then look at deprecation messages? I'm sure that 'The "x" keyword argument of int() is deprecated' is not the best wording, and may be even ugly wording. Could you please suggest better wording David?
Patches don't document new deprecations because it is not documented that keyword arguments are supported either. Is mentioning in What's New enough? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年03月02日 15:12:40 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, vstinner, r.david.murray |
| 2017年03月02日 15:12:40 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1488467560.66.0.804171371287.issue29695@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年03月02日 15:12:40 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue29695 messages |
| 2017年03月02日 15:12:40 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|