Message28793
| Author |
tim.peters |
| Recipients |
| Date |
2006年06月13日.06:50:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
| Marked as misclassified |
| Message-id |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
The grammar is correct as-is anyway, so closing this as
invalid ("and" is left-associative, that's critical to
correct understanding of its short-circuit semantics, and
the production for and_test is left-recursive to make that
clear: "a and b and c" must be parsed as "(a and b) and c",
not as "a and (b and c)" as the suggested change would force). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2007年08月23日 14:40:35 | admin | link | issue1505081 messages |
| 2007年08月23日 14:40:35 | admin | create |
|