Message286976
| Author |
marco.buttu |
| Recipients |
docs@python, marco.buttu, martin.panter, paul.moore, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, xiang.zhang, zach.ware |
| Date |
2017年02月04日.16:51:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1486227099.37.0.377048109282.issue29387@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think you are right about the TAB model (Parser/tokenizer.c:40 and Lib/tokenize.py:215), that is why the difference between the two cases.
In any case, I am not sure whether expliciting the type of the exeption is the best choice. So, to me +1 to just change "should report" with "reports" in the proposed patch, and +0 to indicate the exeption type. |
|