Message286340
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost |
| Date |
2017年01月27日.00:21:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1485476498.98.0.648777621046.issue29379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I presume this is the same as in Issue 18543 (and a few other duplicates). Let me know if I got it wrong.
IMO there is no easy fix. The best solution may be to just document the behaviour as a limitation of the API, and design a new/improved API for the future (Py 3.7+) that handles these cases. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年01月27日 00:21:39 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost |
| 2017年01月27日 00:21:38 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1485476498.98.0.648777621046.issue29379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年01月27日 00:21:38 | martin.panter | link | issue29379 messages |
| 2017年01月27日 00:21:38 | martin.panter | create |
|