Message285411
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
methane, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2017年01月13日.15:51:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1484322674.89.0.692607587334.issue29259@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
tp_fastcall.patch modifies property_descr_get() to use tp_fastcall if available, or use the cached tuple. Once performances are validated (no regression), the cached tuple as to pass position arguments, should go away.
By the way, msg285390 uses the following micro-benchmark:
---
import perf
bench = perf.Runner()
bench.timeit("namedtuple.attr",
"a.a",
"from collections import namedtuple as n; a = n('n', 'a b c')(1, 2, 3)",
duplicate=20)
---
It tests property_descr_get() with operator.itemgetter(). It would be nice to benchmark property_descr_get() with other functions. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017年01月13日 15:51:14 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2017年01月13日 15:51:14 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1484322674.89.0.692607587334.issue29259@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017年01月13日 15:51:14 | vstinner | link | issue29259 messages |
| 2017年01月13日 15:51:14 | vstinner | create |
|