Message 285300 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	martin.panter
Recipients	BreamoreBoy, martin.panter, niemeyer
Date	2017年01月12日.10:48:45
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1484218125.46.0.00277213760782.issue17824@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
The patch for Issue 26228 proposes an improvement to the situation, although it is not perfect and does not include a test. I wonder if it is possible to replace fork() and execlp() with a subprocess.Popen invokation, at least in a new Python release?

Content

The patch for Issue 26228 proposes an improvement to the situation, although it is not perfect and does not include a test. I wonder if it is possible to replace fork() and execlp() with a subprocess.Popen invokation, at least in a new Python release?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017年01月12日 10:48:45	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, niemeyer, BreamoreBoy
2017年01月12日 10:48:45	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1484218125.46.0.00277213760782.issue17824@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017年01月12日 10:48:45	martin.panter	link	issue17824 messages
2017年01月12日 10:48:45	martin.panter	create

homepage