Message 283850 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	Eric Lafontaine
Recipients	Eric Lafontaine, barry, bpoaugust, r.david.murray
Date	2016年12月22日.15:38:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1482421121.06.0.126444138231.issue28945@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Hi, I would like to have a bigger set of user testing this patch before it gets approve... I really don't know all the extent to which it's a good/bad idea. The proposition was to not do the unquote in the rfc2231 collapse method. It doesn't break anything on my machine on all the email tests... but I can't feel safe. I also added the 2 test case for future support (multiline boundary and single line boundary). It's basically the code I pasted on my answer on the 2016年12月20日. Let me know what you think. Is it there we should stop doing it? Regards, Eric Lafontaine

Content

Hi,
I would like to have a bigger set of user testing this patch before it gets approve... I really don't know all the extent to which it's a good/bad idea. 
The proposition was to not do the unquote in the rfc2231 collapse method. It doesn't break anything on my machine on all the email tests... but I can't feel safe.
I also added the 2 test case for future support (multiline boundary and single line boundary). It's basically the code I pasted on my answer on the 2016年12月20日.
Let me know what you think. Is it there we should stop doing it?
Regards,
Eric Lafontaine

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016年12月22日 15:38:41	Eric Lafontaine	set	recipients: + Eric Lafontaine, barry, r.david.murray, bpoaugust
2016年12月22日 15:38:41	Eric Lafontaine	set	messageid: <1482421121.06.0.126444138231.issue28945@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016年12月22日 15:38:41	Eric Lafontaine	link	issue28945 messages
2016年12月22日 15:38:40	Eric Lafontaine	create

homepage