Message283025
| Author |
abarry |
| Recipients |
abarry, barry, gvanrossum, mrabarnett, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, syeberman, veky |
| Date |
2016年12月12日.16:42:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1481560940.28.0.137174209097.issue28937@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Barry: Sure, the docs example was just a quick write-up, you can word it however you want!
Guido: Pretty much, except the other way around (when prune is False, i.e. "don't remove empty strings").
The attached patch exposes the behaviour (it's identical to last night's, but I'm re-uploading it as an unrelated file went in), except that the `prune` argument isn't keyword-only (I didn't know how to do this, and didn't bother searching for just a proof-of-concept). |
|