Message282385
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年12月05日.06:06:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That was my initial preference. Mainly because this doesn't add code churn.
But I don't understand how PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() that uses _PyObject_CallArg1() and has many local variables can consume less stack than _PyObject_CallArg1() itself. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年12月05日 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, python-dev |
| 2016年12月05日 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年12月05日 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue28858 messages |
| 2016年12月05日 06:06:16 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|