Message282371
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年12月04日.22:13:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1480889633.85.0.624745673359.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Serhiy Storchaka reported that Python 3.6 crashs earlier than Python 3.5 on calling json.dumps() when sys.setrecursionlimit() is increased.
Reference: http://bugs.python.org/issue23507#msg282190 (issue #23507).
Serhiy Storchaka: "Yes, that is why I asked you to revert your changes."
Sorry, I misunderstood your comments. So yes, my change b9c9691c72c5 introduced a regression. Sorry, I didn't have time before now to revert my change. I just pushed the change d35fc6e58a70 which reverts b9c9691c72c5.
The question is how replacing PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() with _PyObject_CallArg1() increases the usage of the C stack. I wrote my change to reduce the usage of the C stack.
PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() allocates 5 "PyObject *", so 40 bytes, on the C stack. Maybe using _PyObject_CallArg1() increases the usage of C stack in the *caller*.
> In additional, they introduced compiler warnings.
This one was fixed by Benjamin Peterson in the issue #28855 (change 96245d4af0ca). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年12月04日 22:13:53 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016年12月04日 22:13:53 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1480889633.85.0.624745673359.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年12月04日 22:13:53 | vstinner | link | issue28858 messages |
| 2016年12月04日 22:13:53 | vstinner | create |
|